Cluster sizes are measured, not estimated — each is the count of matching
discussion threads in a 71,580-thread corpus.
I met something. What was it?
36 discussion threads ask a version of this
The most common reason people go looking after a breakthrough — trying to put a name to a being that felt specific and intentional. The Atlas mirrors an encounter against the archetypes others most commonly report, with how often each appears and who documented it.
Why do strangers describe the same beings?
260 discussion threads ask a version of this
Machine elves, a mantis, a feminine presence, a jester — people who have never met and never compared notes report the same recurring figures. That the descriptions converge is the documented, interesting fact. It does not settle what they are.
Was any of that real, or was it just my brain?
137 discussion threads ask a version of this
The question people ask most, and genuinely unresolved. The serious positions — disrupted top-down control, Jungian archetypes, Strassman's and Gallimore's independently-real hypotheses, and plain agnosticism — are mapped side by side. The Atlas takes no verdict.
It shook me. What now?
75 discussion threads ask a version of this
A large share of the questions people ask are not about the trip — they are about the weeks after it. What is commonly reported afterwards, what tends to settle on its own, and where real peer support and crisis lines are.
It felt like a message. Did it mean something?
311 discussion threads ask a version of this
The download, the sense of being expected, the cosmic joke, the conviction that you already knew this. These recur across thousands of accounts as describable, nameable themes — which is itself the finding.
Where was I?
231 discussion threads ask a version of this
The waiting room, the domed cathedral, the control room, the library, the void. People describe arriving somewhere with structure and consistency, and the reported places have been mapped as named regions.
What is the geometry I keep seeing?
59 discussion threads ask a version of this
The chrysanthemum at the threshold, the carrier wave, living language, faces embedded in everything. The perceptual signatures are catalogued with what the science says about each.
Is this the same as a near-death experience?
83 discussion threads ask a version of this
Partly. In a placebo-controlled study DMT scored higher than placebo on 15 of 16 Greyson NDE-scale items — but the signature NDE elements, the life review and meeting the deceased, are rare in DMT reports. It models the feeling and the structure; it demonstrates nothing about an afterlife.
Is DMT actually being studied?
90 discussion threads ask a version of this
Yes, and far more than most people assume. The research layer indexes the peer-reviewed literature, the registered clinical trials, the patent landscape, and a cited history — each linked to its primary source.
I don't know what I'm asking yet.
585 discussion threads ask a version of this
The single largest shape in the measured corpus is someone simply asking for help — no keyword, no category, just needing a person. Start with the questions everyone asks; if yours isn't there, the board below is open.